Respond to Davon and Brandon do you agree with your peer about what makes the issue they mentioned an ethical issue? Why, or why not. What framework seems relevant to the ethical issue your peer mentioned? Why? In the ethical issue your peer mentioned, what is at stake and for whom?
DAVON POST
Hi, my name is Davon Whitehead. I was born and raised in Detroit, Michigan and I currently live in Harrison Township, Michigan. I commute back and forth to Cupertino, California for work as a QA Engineer for Apple. I?m currently enrolled in the BS Information Technologies – Software Development program and I?m excited to start this journey with my fellow classmates at SNHU.
An ethical issue I?ve recently noticed in media was the execution of 55-year-old death row inmate, Marcellus Williams. In 1998, he was convicted of murder and was sentenced to death September 24, 2024, after Missouri Supreme Court denied a last-minute appeal. He previously faced execution dates in 2015 and 2017, but his execution was delayed. DNA testing proved that he was not the source of DNA on the murder weapon. No eyewitness or forensic evidence connected Mr. Williams to the crime. According to his attorney racial bias was evident and his jury trial was unfair. Despite the evidence, Missouri Supreme court denied Williams stay of execution and he was put to death by lethal injection.
Capital Punishment is an ethical issue that raises many controversial questions. Is the death penalty a just form of punishment? Does it serve as an effective deterrent to crime? How does lawmakers ensure the death penalty is administered fairly and justly? In the case of Marcellus Williams, how do we address wrongful convictions that result in the death penalty? I agree with Attorney Wesley Bell who stated, “Even for those who disagree on the death penalty, when there is a shadow of a doubt of any defendant?s guilt, the irreversible punishment of execution should not be an option.?
BRANDON POST
My name is Brandon, and I’m a 31-year-old software engineer. My major is Computer Science. One ethical issue I?ve noticed in the media is how certain perspectives, like traditional gender beliefs or criticisms of affirmative action policies, are sometimes portrayed in ways that feel one-sided. This topic raises important questions about the role of the media and whether it has an ethical duty to represent a balanced spectrum of viewpoints.
For instance, the media often highlights progressive views on gender and identity, which can marginalize those who hold more traditional beliefs. This can leave people feeling ostracized or misrepresented, which poses an ethical issue regarding inclusivity. Ethical journalism should aim to include a variety of perspectives, especially on social issues, so that audiences feel their beliefs are respected rather than dismissed.
Similarly, affirmative action is often presented in ways that emphasize its goals of equality and diversity, but the media may underrepresent criticisms of the policy, such as concerns about fairness. Ethically, the media has a responsibility to cover both the benefits and drawbacks of such policies, allowing people to see the full picture. By doing so, the media can help foster a more informed and open public discussion.
When the media promotes one perspective while downplaying others, it can lead to social polarization and leave some individuals feeling alienated. For a healthy democracy, balanced representation of various beliefs and viewpoints is essential, as it encourages respect for different opinions and supports more inclusive, productive conversations.
Have a similar assignment? “Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results.”
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|